Archive for the ‘Radiators’ Category

XSPC RS360 Radiator

Posted: March 27, 2012 in Radiators
Tags: , , ,

This is the first in my series of triple radiators the XPSC RS360.  The RS360 is XSPC’s more value oriented radiator in a slim form factor.  While extra thickness can show some performance advantage by 10% or so, it’s not double as you might expect and cutting the materials down into a slim form factor generally nets you a better value.  The RS360 is a standard 120mm slim triple in that is utilizes the more standard 15mm fan spacing and a more narrow core at 121mm in width.  This radiator is slightly tuned for more medium to high-speed fans per XSPC’s website although I wouldn’t necessarily consider it a high density radiator either.  This was the first radiator I received and I think a great place to start

A special thanks to Paul from XSPC for providing the review sample:

Manufacturer Specifications:

http://www.xs-pc.com/products/radiators/rs-series/rs360-triple-fan-radiator/

High Performance Copper Fin Radiator

– Matt Black Finish
– Dimensions: 121x35x397mm (WxDxH)
– 19mm Flat tubes for reduced flow resistance
– 1 Row 11 Tubes
– Compact Design
– G1/4″ Ports
– 6-32 Screws

Supplied with mounting screws

There are a few noteworthy specs here including the “Compact Design” which it is at only 121mm in width and 35mm depth. Also note that the radiator uses 1 row of 11 tubes, so this does mean that there will be 6 tubes one way and 5 the other.  Also you have 6-32 SAE screws.  I tend to prefer the finer threads of M4 myself, but 6-32 works ok and much better than M3.

360 Radiator Shootout Begins!

Posted: February 22, 2012 in Radiators

My new focus for testing over the next few months is completing a 360 radiator shootout.  I’ve been in need of a break from the block testing and wanted to contribute something on my new site radiator specific. Rad Bench built…check.  A small tower of radiator samples to start working on…check…:)

SAMPLES ON HAND NOW TESTING SOON

  1. XSPC RS360
  2. XSPC EX360
  3. XSPC RX360
  4. Swiftech MCR320 QP
  5. Swiftech MCR320 XP
  6. Hardware Labs GTX360
  7. Hardware Labs SR1360
  8. Alphacool Nexxxos Pro III Radiator Rev. 2
  9. Alphacool Nexxos XT45 Full Copper 360
  10. Alphacool Nexxos UT60 Full Copper 360
  11. Phobya G-Changer 360
  12. EK Coolstream 360 XT
  13. EK Coolstream 360 XTX

I may request more as I get closer to finishing this up, but that’s what I have on hand so far.

WISH LIST FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE TESTING 

These are radiators I haven’t managed to get sponsored yet which folks have asked me to request:

Aquacomputer AMS Copper 360

Koolance HX-CU1020VS 20-FPI Copper

Koolance HX-CU1403V 30-FPI Copper

Thermochill TA120.3 15mm

Aquacomputer AMS Aluminum 360

And a few others that I wouldn’t mind trying out:

Coolgate 360

Hardware Labs Black Ice GTS 360

Hardware Labs Black Ice Pro 360

Hardware Labs Black Ice Extreme 360

Magic Cool Slim Triple 360

I will begin making requests for these after nearing completion of my first 11 and will test whatever I’m sponsored.

SPONSORS

A special thanks to my many sponsors:

Danger Den sponsored the Hardware Labs GTX 360 and Hardware Labs SR1 360 radiators as well as the MC-TDX waterblock.

Aqua Computers sponsored the Aqua Computer’s flow meter and the Aquaero 5XT I plan to use for fan control.

Swiftech sponsored the MCR320 QP(Quiet Power), MCR320 XP (Extreme Performance) radiators as well as the MCP-35X2 pump.

XSPC sponsored the XSPC RS360, XSPC EX360, and XSPC RX360 radiators.

Aquatuning sponsored the Alphacool NexXxoS Pro III 360, Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 Full Copper 360, Alphacool NexXxoS XT60 Full Copper 360, and Phobya G-Changer 360 radiators.

EK sponsored the EK Coolstream XT360 and Coolstream XTX360 radiators

This is going to take a while, but it should be good data when it’s all said and done.

At a minimum I plan to test from 500RPM to 2,200RPM in push & Push+Pull condition with the 35X2 at an average 40% power level.  Additionally I may do some sort of shroud and pumping power sensitivity type testing.  The fans are 25mm 9 blade Titans similar in blade shape to the Gentle Typhoons but with a bit more RPM range.  I decided to forgo multi fan type tested and opting for these as I think they will represent a good average CFM/RPM performance level to that of the typhoons and other higher blade density 25mm fans.

For heat load I am looking at adjusting the heat to several increments with the intent to target about a 10C delta +-.  This will mean testing 500RPM levels at 100Watts, 1400RPM at 200Watts, and 2200RPM levels at 300Watts plus pump heat.  The lines are all insulated and the fans in push are permanently fixed to the triple radiator push template.  I will be logging RPM to average out the RPM levels throughout the test and logging data so I can ensure stability and reasonably constant ambient levels.

If you have any particular requests, now is the time to ask..:)  Also if there is a particular radiator model not already listed, please suggest that too.  I have several others I’m interested in, but holding back on making additional requests until I get caught up a bit.  I’ve been considering Thermochill, Koolance, EK, AquaComputers, Magicool, Coolgate, etc. as possible others to add to the list.

Cheers!
Martin

Add on.

Had some questions regarding the anemometer readings, here is a sample from my initial trial run.  Rather than test at each heat load I plan to test more points with the anemometer to get a good curve developed.

3/12/12 Update

My recent hardware failure set me back a little not having my Crystalfontz to log data with, but I’m back as of this weekend.  I’ve started in on the XSPC radiators first and have pressure drop on all three done and thermals done on the RS.  When I complete thermals on the EX and RX, I will release the XSPC grouping and move down the list.  I also just got in EK’s radiators, so even more goodness of radiators to complete testing on…:)  Still intermixing a little bit of CPU block testing on the 3930K in between this radiator work, and planning to wrap blocks work so I can dedicate myself to completing the radiator tests.

Every now and then the discussion comes up in forums where someone gets the idea that they want to run their radiators passively without out any fan power at all.  The discussion recently came up again and I decided to dig out some old test data and share a quick blog on what I found back on my V1 test bench while testing a low density double thickness 480 sized radiator.

When I was testing my TFC480 radiator back on my V1 test bench, I tried exactly that.  I even dialed down the heat to a bare minimum 100 watts to test a very small (perfect conditions) scenario.  The TFC 480 radiator is a premium double thickness low density radiator that performs really well with low speed fans, so I figured it would be the pefect test case.

So I proceeded to use my very smallest heater, and in the optimal open bench setting with the radiator pointing upward proceeded to test at 100W heat load.

1 hour went by….still not stable

2 hours went by…temps still climbing…

Almost 3 hours later, temps are still climbing…The tubing was hot to the touch and I began to worry about my heaters fracturing in their glass tubes and decided to call it quits.   This is what that test data log looked like:

FAILED!

I consider an “Average” radiator setup performance to be around a 10C water/air delta and the radiator nearly doubled that on this incomplete test.  Perhaps you could get passive to work in a case where you had a power supply pulling air through the case and radiator, but then that’s not really passive is it?

Bottom line, passive operation on conventional radiators just doesn’t work well enough to consider it a useful option.  I would ask why bother when 600RPM fans are quieter than a mouse fart anyhow…:)

It would take a very different type of radiator and much much larger surface areas for passive to work well.

Cheers!
Martin

While I have done radiator shroud testing before using more conventional 7 bladed fans, I wanted to do an update to both serve in shroud results and also give me some hands on time with my new radiator testing bench to see if there are any tweaks remaining before settling on a test method.  I had noticed in my previous shroud testing that push vs pull optimization was different depending on the fan used, but I didn’t really have enough data to conclude it was fan speed alone or if it was simply the type of fan.

After testing many more fans, the Gentle Typhoons were again one of the stronger in CFM/dbA ratio on a radiator, so I figure it only makes sense to follow up with that fan to see what if any change is apparent there.  In addition I used TFC 30mm shrouds in the old test and I wanted to compare that shroud to using an old gutted 25mm fan which is cheaper and many people do use.

So with that, I’m updating to a new radiator test bench with more controlled air flow measurements and the ability to also measure air flow volume.

Before getting started, I’d like to thank the sponsors that provided parts I used in this test:

Swiftech sponsored the MCR120QP radiator

Koolance sponsored the PMP-450 pump

Danger Den sponsored the MC-TDX waterblock

TFC sponsored the TFC 30mm shroud

TEST METHOD

Using my new radiator test bench V2, I’ll be running the system with the pump at setting 3 which is producing approximately 1.7GPM or so. Heat is provide via a modified aquarium heater and tuned to 125W for approximately a 10C delta system with the fan running at full speed.  Seventeen thermal probes are measuring water in, water out, air in, and air out.  In addition a hot wire anemometer is measuring air velocity, a “Kill-a-Watt” is measuring heater wattage, and another multimeter is measuring voltage at the fan plug.

Here is the setup with the access window temporarily opened.  During testing the top acrylic panel will be closed so all air out goes through the air out port for air measurement.

I’m looking to log temps for about an hour after stability is reached to average out the ambient fluctuations.

As with any good testing, I think it’s important to show not only the testing rig, but also the data collected to develop the conclusion.  While many go straight to the results, I’m sticking to my usual “testing story” approach and going to share the details of how I came to any conclusions.

It has been a while since I did any radiator testing and looking to develop a new test bench V2.  The old V1 bench was tore down to salvage sensors from for latter thermal testing, and I wanted to make some improvements to it as well.  This blog is dedicated to the development and building of the new V2 test bench.

The Old V1 problem areas:

  • No shielding –  During some prototype testing I noticed that simple things like a door opening or just simple air flow around a room can cause errors.
  • Air In Radiant Heat – I’m not sure, but some past comments thought my air in sensors were too close to the radiator and could be getting some radiant heat by the radiator.
  • Air In sensors changed depending on radiator size – My old bench was also designed in sections where it had two air in and one air out sensor for each 120mm fan section.  This complicated the processing of data requiring four different templates to turn on/off sensors that were not used.
  • Fixed Water Flow @ 1.5GPM – My past V1 method was to adjust a valve to fix the flow at 1.5GPM.  My thought was that would be a good average.  Unfortunately, this gives a slight advantage to high restriction radiators.  While flow rates effects are small, I wanted to do more of a fixed pump condition to allow the flow rate to vary as it would in a normal test system.
  • Too Much Water Volume – My past V1 setup used a larger 4″ reservoir to serve as both the reservoir as well as the heater bath. Unfortunately this adds a lot of water volume and storage to the system requiring extremely long system equilibrium timeframes.  This also caused some error in the result if the ambient is slightly rising or lowering.
  • No Air Flow –  While not really necessary, the old V1 only tested per an RPM level.  I still think that is generally good, however I’ve always been curious to look at relationships to actual air flow through the radiator as well.  Since I bought the hot wire anemometer for the last fan testing round update, I figured I may as well incorporate the tool into the new radiator test bench.
  • 4×120 Capacity Limit – The old bench was only set up for 120mm radiators and I wanted to have the ability to test at least 140s and possibly a bit wider too.

1-5-2012 SKETCHUP CONCEPT 1 V2 Bench

So with that, I ordered more sensors, bought some wood planks, some acrylic window, and ordered in a new kill-a-watt as well as one 200 watt in-line heater to experiment with.

So far, this is what I have.   I haven’t started cutting yet, but I’m looking for thoughts and opinions.

I am also considering making it much taller and enclosing the top portion with a similar 4″ outlet port to measure air out temps, but I’m hesitant to create any more bench air restriction although I suppose that wouldn’t be much different than an actual case.  I just don’t think you can measure air-out temps without ducting it, the fans cause too much disturbance and again I don’t want to be moving the sensors.  I feel strongly that a good test bench much fix the sensors independent of the product being tested for consistency.

I’m also debating on the CPU block.  It’s not really necessary with the variable speed pump.  I could simply adjust the pump speed to a low pumping level, perhaps level 2 or so to get approximately 1.5GPM with an average restriction radiator and call it good.  I may also include a flow meter for the additional flow data.

Another uncertainty is the sensor types and control.  The options are the higher number of sensors and more accurate Dallas One Wire .2C accuracy sensors using the Crystalfontz and using Excel to post process, or use the Aquaero 5 and have the ability to monitor result real time with great plotting of all the results on a single page but with a maximum of 8 total sensors. I see benefits to both, but leaning toward the Crystalfontz due to the more accurate and higher number of sensors allows.

Finally there is also some question about which pump to use.  I am a bit divided between a PMP-450 (D5 vario) and the aquastream XT.  Both provide enough pumping power for what I’m trying to do although I may be able to control 5W worth of fan speeds using the aquastream and would probably have a bit more refined pump speed control using the aquastream.

As far as fans, I’m not sure, but thinking I’ll use GT15s this time around for something like a 600,1200,1850 RPM test and maybe something else for high speed.  I have three GT15s that could go to the cause, but I’d have to probably order the others or see a sponsor for the other fans. I am also a bit unsure about fan control yet, may use voltage, may use my crystalfontz PWM%, or I may use the AQ5 if I get a new main board.

Anyhow, looking for your thoughts.  Once I get the box and sensor system built, I’ll probably start in on some basic shroud testing on a single 120mm rad to see how it goes.

Cheers!
Martin

1-7-12

I got my Hydor 200W In-Line heater in and checked it out.  It’s a fairly simple unit.  It’s basically just a glass tube with thin coils around the perimeter necked down for the barb ends.  That’s good for practically no restriction, but there is some volume of water in there due to the larger glass interior.  Anyhow, here are a couple of pictures.  I’m debating on using it or building my own slim reservoir to hold an aquarium heater.  I thought these in-line heaters would be smaller and have very little internal volume.

And here is a slight modification to allow air-out measurement with a fully enclosed idea:

And just the same thing rendered with paint for fun..:)

But enough playing with models and renders, time to break out the table and scroll saws..

Even though this is just a test rig, I couldn’t help but dado in the joints.

And a quick dry fit test, and it’s starting to look like the plan.  I just need to spend some time with the router table tomorrow and make some cuts for the back and windows, a little sanding, and I’ll be off to gluing and finishing.

1-8-12

Got most of the actual enclosure portion built, now it’s time to do all the plumbing and electrical.  Not quite sure I want to use the In-line Hydor heater or not, but I suppose I should at least try it temporarily.  Look back on my past radiator testing, I was using upwards of 600 watts worth of heater to do the quad radiators.  I didn’t spend much time finishing considering this is just a test rig, but it came out pretty good for rather minimal time put into it.

And, here is the mess of heater options to choose from.  The aquarium heaters are nice and slim, but they are rather long.

I was working on a 1″ PVC slim reservoir/bath for the heater to the far left that helps a bit, but still fairly long.  The advantage of that is I can buy up to 500w heaters that could slip right in/out of the reservoir where the in-line heaters are a bit more difficult to switch out. Hmmm….

1-9-12

Decided to go forward with the PVC heater bath/mini reservoir as seemed to provide the most clean routing and also provide an opportunity for easier switching of heat values.  I currently have 200 and 300w aquarium heaters with disabled safety switches and with a little search have found 500, 800, and 1000W variants as well as 150s.  I’m thinking a 200W and 500W would make a good heat source option for 1-2 sections and 3-4 sections tested respectively. I previously tested at up to 600W worth of heat but that was quite a bit for even my previous 1000RPM low end.  I’m thinking my new test method will be looking to lower the min RPM to 600-800 range.

Anyhow, after making the decision, the plumbing went fairly smooth.  The hardest part was fabricating the acetal hold down bracket for the heater, the rest was assembling various spare parts.

Using the Danger Den MC-TDX and the Koolance PMP-450 at setting 3 would net flow rates right around 1.5GPM on average depending on the radiator restriction.  More free flow radiators could see 1.8GPM while more restrictive ones could see 1.3GPM or so.  I think that’s a good pump/restriction scenario.

1-12-12

I decided to redo the sensors at the air out port to reduce as much restriction as possible.

That’s better…

And for the inlet port, I wanted a more controlled velocity profile for the anemometer, so I turned this piece of 4″ coupling to make a short port with a nice tapered inlet.  Excuse the messy lathe covered in chips from various garage projects…:)

And this is the result after mounting the hot wire anemometer probe and thermal sensors.

Continuing with the low restriction port theme, I carefully soldered the sensors onto the flat wire and simply extended them into the stream of flow spaced evenly around the port.  The 6 air in thermal sensors are one of the more critical for that water/air in delta number, so I spent a little more time on this.  The length of the port also helps separate the anemometer air flow sensor from the temp sensors and still allows me to slide the anemometer hot wire probe shut for calibration.

1/14/02

Pretty much got her done.  Building the water sensors was it’s usual pain and more so since I wanted to have four for each in and out of the radiator.  I ended up burning one of the inlet sensors, but otherwise it went pretty well.  Not so surprisingly since each sensor is buried in the same hunk of brass, they all measure pretty much the same anyhow, three will be more than adequate.

Below is a quick view of the simple acrylic radiator templates.  This is one for single 120mm radiators, and it’s really easy to make anything from 1×120 up to 4×140.

Above you can see the water sensors in place before insulating the lines.

With the emphasis to minimize all external losses to help speed up equilibrium time and also more accurately represent heat loads without pipe loss, I insulated everything.  The pump itself is producing about 8 watts of heat at setting 3, so it’s as simple as dialing in my variac to 192 watts to test at a 200 watt load.  There will still be some very minor losses, but it’s about as good as you can do from a power consumption measurement standpoint.

In testing the pump at setting three I got the following information:

The pump setting at #3 and block used will produce roughly a 1.5GPM flow rate depending on the radiator restriction.  At that point it is operating at about a 14% efficiency and producing roughly 8 watts of heat.  The D5 series also has a metal pump housing which acts as a water cooling to the pump electronics.  Very little of the heat actually escapes through the exterior, so I think 8 watts is a good estimated added heat level.

Another view of the whole bench.

I will probably change out the fan controller to the Aquaero 5 later, but for trial runs and some shroud testing, this will do.

In total this gave me 17 temperature sensors which took a little while to map out.  Using the Cystalfontz, this is what I see:

This bench is Done…:) Time for testing…

THE FANS

I’ve been thinking pretty hard about what fans to use, and decided to spend some time looking over some CFM vs RPM data I collected in my round 6 fan testing.  While not all fans follow suite, generally I could lump most of the fans into three categories, your typical 7 blade 25mm fan, a more dense blade 25mm fan, and 38mm fans.  This is how a few of them compare:

Initially I thought about using gentle typhoons since they tested so well and becoming fairly popular, but I only had three of them on hand.  I also bought enough Delta’s to use and noticed that they test exceptionally strong in CFM vs RPM so trying to mix data between GTs and Deltas would make a big mismatch at the matching end. I really wanted to just use one fan that would cover all bases from 600-3000RPM.  After doing some more testing on my Delta AFB1212HE, I found that I could dial RPM down to 600RPM if they are started at higher speeds.  Also after looking at the very linear results here I don’t see why I couldn’t just test with the Delta at all RPMs and then correct the RPM results to GT15 and Yate Loons for three sets of data.  Still thinking about this, but I think it should work just fine.

Here is the round 8 run compared to the yate loon and the actual HE model which did include some points down low:

In the 600 RPM range, the yate requires about 130RPM more to get the same CFM.

In the 140 RPM range the yate take about 350RPM more…etc.

In the end I think it does make sense to test with just one fan and correlate the results to something like the yate loon 25mm which would represent many of the 7 blade 25mm fans.

Still a bit undecided on which fans to use.  I am also considering Gentle Typhoon AP-29s as that would offer a similar 600-3000RPM range in a more traditional 25mm fan thickness.  I’ll give Scythe a buzz and see if they are interested in sponsoring.

In the end, this is basically what I built:

MATERIALS EQUIPMENT LIST:

  • Temperature Probes: Dallas Digital One Wire DS18B20 probes.  These are good to about .2C absolute accuracy in normal water cooling temp ranges and have a nice fine .0625C resolution.  Also since they communicate digitally, you can string the power, ground and Vdd wire in series between all the sensors limiting the amount of wires significantly.
  • Anemometer: Extech 40723 Hot Wire Anemometer for measuring air velocity: http://www.extech.com/instruments/product.asp?catid=1&prodid=39
  • Pump: Koolance PMP-450 Setting 3
  • Block: Danger Den MC-TDX block
  • Heater: Standard Aquarium Heaters with safety switch soldered in the closed position so heat remains on regardless of temperature.  This requires removing the heater element from the glass tube, soldering the two tabs together and putting it all back together.  I like testing around 100W per fan section as a ballpark.  I am also gaining roughly 9 watts from the pump at setting 3 based on previous pump testing.
  • Heater/Reservoir Bath:  I fabricated this from 1″ schedule 40 PVC with a T and elbow to 1/2″NPT threaded fittings and then used NPT nylon barbs to connect tubing.  The cap I had to use a 1-1/4″ threaded cap and turned it in my lathe to fit the exterior of the 1″ T fitting.
  • Insulation was a combination of 1″ and 1/2″ pipe insulationg cut to fit.
  • Tubing is 3/8″ ID x 1/2″ OD tubing.
  • Case Material – 1/2″ x 8″ Pine it’s a little over 24″ wide to barely fit 4x140mm rads.  The bench overall height is about 18″.
  • Inlet port was fabricated from a 4″ flange material making an ID opening of 4.540″ Diameter.  I shaved the threads out of it and tapered the inlet on the lathe for a smoother inlet.
  • Acrylic panels are all .100″ thickness and I dado cut slots into the shelves for them to fit into.
  • Multi-meter for the fans is just a Cen-Tech hard wired at the fan plug in.
  • Current Fan Controller is a Scythe Kaze Master, will likely upgrade to something else later.
  • Heater Control is via a 3A  generic Variac, although 5A would be better for higher heat loads.  I generally find the variac does a good job at not only controlling voltage down, but also stabilizes the voltage to be more smooth.  Reducing voltage from 120 volts to 100 or so gives stability such that the watts from the heater on a 125W setting rarely deviates more than a couple of watts.
  • For Watt Metering – P3 Kill-A-Watt and just manually observing and correcting wattage.

That’s all, hope this helps!
Martin